Attorney General's News Release
March 6, 2008
Nixon’s “Operation Taken For A Ride” targets sellers of extended service contracts for vehicles who use high-pressure, misleading tactics
Jefferson City, Mo. — Attorney General Jay Nixon
today took legal action against several businesses, most of them based
in the St. Louis area, that used misrepresentation and deception to
sell motor vehicle extended service contracts (MVESC) to consumers.
Nixon said the coordinated filings of lawsuits and settlements, dubbed
“Operation Taken For A Ride,” involve scores of consumers from across
the country who were misled into paying for extended service contracts
on their vehicles that, in most cases, they did not need.
“It’s rather insidious how these companies prey upon consumers’
fears, sending misleading letters informing them that their current
motor vehicle warranties were about to expire, when in fact many of the
consumers possessed factory warranties that wouldn’t expire for several
months,” Nixon said. “That was the hook to sell these consumers
unneeded motor vehicle extended service contracts for hundreds or
thousands of dollars. When consumers canceled the contracts, many
received only a partial refund or no refund at all.”
Nixon says the companies mislead consumers in letters and postcards
with boldfaced statements such as “Notification of Interruption!” and
“Important Dated Material Enclosed” — leaving the impression that they
are sent from the manufacturers who produced the consumers’ vehicles or
the dealers who sold the vehicles to them. In fact, Nixon said, the
defendants fail to inform the consumers that they are not affiliated
with the manufacturer, dealer or any local, state or federal government
agency, and that the mailings amount to advertisements for the
company’s MVESC.
“Many consumers — confused, but not wanting their car warranties to
expire — went ahead and purchased the new, but in most cases unneeded,
service contract the company was hawking,” Nixon said.
In one case, an elderly consumer received a postcard stating that
her motor vehicle warranty was “expired or about to expire” in March
2007, even though her actual extended warranty through General Motors
wouldn’t expire until November 2008. The consumer purchased a new MVESC
for $1,898 from the company, and the company refused to issue a refund
when it was requested.
Nixon filed one of his lawsuits against that company, Vehicle
Services Inc., of St. Peters, in St. Charles County Circuit Court,
requesting injunctions, restitution for consumers, penalties and other
relief. In addition, the Attorney General filed lawsuits today against
the following businesses:
- TXEN Partners, which does business as Service Protection Direct
of St. Louis; and a related company, United Warranty Solutions, for
using misleading notification letters to pressure, confuse and
intimidate consumers into purchasing MVESCs they did not need. The
defendants failed to disclose coverage requirements to consumers who
purchased MVESCs (such as the requirement to use a specific brand of
oil to receive reimbursement for repairs); failed to honor contract
terms and perform repair on consumers’ vehicles; and failed to issue
refunds to consumers, including one consumer who is owed as much as
$3,800. The lawsuit was filed in St. Louis County Circuit Court.
- Dealer Warranty Services of St. Charles, for using misleading
notification letters to pressure, confuse and intimidate consumers into
purchasing MVESCs they did not need. The defendant also misrepresented
to consumers the cost of purchasing the MVESCs and debited the bank
accounts of several consumers without authorization. The lawsuit was
filed in St. Charles County Circuit Court.
- Certified Auto Warranty Services Inc., of Lenexa, Kan., which
promised a “100 percent Money Back Guarantee” to those consumers who
purchased and canceled MVESCs, but then issued only partial refunds or
no refunds at all. One consumer who paid $1,335 canceled her contract,
but has received no refund to date. The lawsuit was filed in Greene
County Circuit Court.
- National Dealers Warranty Inc., of St. Peters, which sent consumers
postcards and letters informing them that they had limited time to
purchase renewed, extended warranties for their vehicles. The company
neglected to inform consumers that it was not affiliated with the
dealers or manufacturers of the vehicle, or that it was actually
offering to sell MVESCs instead of warranties. The lawsuit was filed in
St. Charles County Circuit Court.
- National Auto Warranty Services Inc., of Wentzville, which also
sent consumers postcards and letters informing them that their
warranties were about to expire, and that it was offering them their
final chance to purchase a renewed, extended warranty. The company
failed to inform the consumers that it was not affiliated with the
dealers or manufacturers of the vehicle, and that it was actually
offering to sell MVESCs instead of warranties. In addition, the company
violated the Missouri No Call Law by calling Missourians who were on
the No Call list,
as well as federal telemarketing laws by contacting consumers by phone
and failing to honor their requests not to be called. The lawsuit was
filed in St. Charles County Circuit Court.
- Smart Choice Protection of St. Louis, doing business as Direct
Dealer Warranties, which also sent consumers postcards and letters
informing them that their warranties were about to expire, and that it
was offering the final chance to purchase a renewed, extended warranty.
The company failed to inform the consumers that it was not affiliated
with the dealers or manufacturers of the vehicle, and that it was
actually offering the sell MVESCs instead of warranties. The lawsuit
was filed in St. Louis City Circuit Court.
In addition to the lawsuits, the Attorney General filed assurances
of voluntary compliance with two companies to settle allegations of
misrepresentation in the selling of MVESCs:
- Carhill Enterprises, which does business as Consumer Protection
Services, of 1232 Washington Avenue in St. Louis, will pay $7,209
restitution to eight consumers and $4,000 to the state to cover the
costs of the investigation and enforcement of the case. The company
also agreed to injunctive relief which requires them to inform
consumers upfront of specific details of their product prior to
purchasing. The agreement was filed in St. Louis City Circuit Court;
- Warranty Activation Headquarters, of 12244 Tesson Ferry Road in St.
Louis, satisfactorily responded to all consumers who complained. The
company will pay $5,000 to the state to cover the costs of the
investigation and enforcement of the case, which was filed in St. Louis
City Circuit Court. The agreement also requires the company to continue to provide
full refunds to any consumers who cancel within 30 days.
Nixon encouraged consumers who have complaints about businesses selling motor vehicle extended service contracts to file complaints with his office, by either going online to ago.mo.gov or by calling the Consumer Protection Hotline at 1-800-392-8222.
Take the "All About Autos" online quiz
Inquiries from consumers should be directed to consumer@ago.mo.gov or 1-800-392-8222 (from within Missouri) or 573-751-3321 (outside Missouri).
All media inquiries should be directed to Press Secretary John Fougere.
E-mail Phone: 573-751-8844 Fax: 573-751-5818