Skip to page content Skip to site navigation
Home :: Consumer Protection :: Consumer Corner
AG Chris Koster | FAQs | Spanish Version / AGO en espaņol
Missouri Attorney General

Consumer Blog

Keeping lead out of children's products

A major announcement came this week from Attorney General's Offices across the country, including ours. Toy maker Mattell reached a settlement with several different states including Missouri, agreeing to pay fines and reduce the amount of lead in their toys.

For years the acceptable standard under federal law has been 600 parts per million of lead - and that only applied to the paint. Lead prevention advocates have long insisted that no amount of lead is safe and therefore that number should be much lower. Federal law will kick in next year that lowers that standard to 90 parts per million. In the settlement with the AGs, Mattel has agreed to start complying with the 90 ppm standard immediately - that's a couple of months ahead of the federal law kicking in.

The new federal law is a significant victory. It of course will apply to all manufacturers of children's products. And besides the paint content, it for the first time regulates the lead content of the metal, plastic or whatever else might be underneath - that's known as substrate. Starting in mid-February, toy makers will have to limit lead in the substrate to 600 ppm, and get it down to 100 ppm by 2011.

Our office conducted two lead testing events for the public in 2007, and it was shocking to see the amount of lead in some of the toys people brought to us. Some new toys were in the thousands of ppm. The most memorable was an old toy tractor that had 85,000 ppm - 140 times the federal threshold.

 PS: Check out our online clearinghouse that lists recalls of toys, food, drugs and other products.

 

bookmark on del.icio.us      Digg!      Add to Reddit

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Posted by Travis on February 5, 2009 4:12 pm :: Comments (4) :: Permalink

4 Responses to "Keeping lead out of children's products"

Chuck says:

February 12, 2009 11:48 am

Is it the responsebility of stores to produce a list of items sold that contain lead to the general public?

Denotes the author of this comment is employed by the Attorney General's Office

Travis says:

February 13, 2009 3:16 pm

To Chuck:

Not necessarily - the store's main responsibility is to stop selling products with illegal lead content.

Pat says:

February 26, 2009 7:18 pm

Hello, I went to my local thrift store today and was welcomed with an announcement on the door that children's clothes would no longer be sold due to the new rules pertaining to lead content in children's products. Is this just a misunderstanding or "err on the side of caution" by the thrift store (Scholarshop in Clayton, Mo)? I certainly hope so because I think it's ridiculous if we aren't allowed to buy secondhand clothing especially in the current economic climate. I would appreciate any light you could shed on this issue. Sincerely, Pat Johnson

Denotes the author of this comment is employed by the Attorney General's Office

Travis says:

March 9, 2009 2:00 pm

To Pat:

Some children's clothing has been found to have lead in the buttons, zippers and other parts.

 COMMENTS or QUESTIONS 
(required)
(required, will not be displayed)

Comments will first be reviewed to ensure the content is appropriate for display on the Attorney General's Web site, so expect a delay when searching for your post and response.

Consumer Corner

Blog Search

Recent Blog Entries

 
AGO en español    |    State homepage   |    Missouri statutes   |    Forms   |    Help   |    Site Map   |    RSS   |    Accessibility   |    Privacy Policy   |    Contact Us